<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, is position 11 more effective than 10?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/index.php/google-is-position-11-more-effective-than-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/index.php/google-is-position-11-more-effective-than-10/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/index.php/google-is-position-11-more-effective-than-10/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/?p=215#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Gavin, I am curious to hear how other people search so it&#039;s nice to hear your view. I heard recently of one guy who tends to skip the first few pages on purpose to get to the &#039;more than likely  non-seo&#039;d content&#039;. He&#039;s pretty experienced in IT and having observed less experienced people trawling religiously through each result one-by-one I would guess at his approach being more unique! We do put a lot of time (and adjusting) into websites to consider how users use a website but I would like to research more into clickthroughs - I really couldn&#039;t find much when I was looking but then, maybe I need to tone up my searching skills! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Gavin, I am curious to hear how other people search so it&#8217;s nice to hear your view. I heard recently of one guy who tends to skip the first few pages on purpose to get to the &#8216;more than likely  non-seo&#8217;d content&#8217;. He&#8217;s pretty experienced in IT and having observed less experienced people trawling religiously through each result one-by-one I would guess at his approach being more unique! We do put a lot of time (and adjusting) into websites to consider how users use a website but I would like to research more into clickthroughs &#8211; I really couldn&#8217;t find much when I was looking but then, maybe I need to tone up my searching skills! <img src='http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavin francis</title>
		<link>http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/index.php/google-is-position-11-more-effective-than-10/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>gavin francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polr.co.uk/online-marketing/?p=215#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I think searchings a pretty particular thing. I always pick one or two from the top five then move on the bottom of the page. SEO&#039;s put a lot of time into thinking about how google works but they should maybe devote some time to how people work also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think searchings a pretty particular thing. I always pick one or two from the top five then move on the bottom of the page. SEO&#8217;s put a lot of time into thinking about how google works but they should maybe devote some time to how people work also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

